My brain is all scrambled trying to prepare for my oral exam in Philosophy.  Philosophy, I should say, is a very intersting subject.  If you reader noticed, I’ve been talking about Philosophy for a while now mainly because this term is my first encounter with that subject and secondly, I find the whole ordeal of questions interesting.  What is even more interesting is the fact that even these Philosophers seem to not get to agree on things that are almost similar. For instance, Descartes and Marcel created the Primary and Secondary Reflection, whether what we see are really there, is there such a thing as truth.  I like Marcel more because his mind seemed to be more intact, but anyway, I don’t agree with one thing he said though.  He said something like “what is embodied should be considered real, it exists.”  So for something to exist, it should be embodied?  I don’t know, that is how I understood the subjectivity of the matter.   But if this is exactly what Marcel was trying to say, then all those concepts does not exist because they are not embodied?  All those concepts that make life more meaningful like love, freedom, justice and truth?  All of them are not embodied, but that does not mean they don’t exist, right?  Or am I just getting way out of hand here?

 

So on the other hand, how was my day?  Well, my car broke down while I was in school and then I added another detail in my ultimate goals before I die, I must learn the insides of a car.  It would be so cool.  For instance like earlier, my car wouldn’t start, wouldn’t it be cool to be seen, a girl in nice clothes, opening the hood of a car and fixing it like a mechanic?  I just like to show off but honestly, it is cool.